For Christmas I received a fascinating gift from a pal - my extremely own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.
Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.
It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating data about me.
Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.
There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.
He wants to expand his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human customers.
It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound just like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.
"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators' rights.
"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.
"I do not believe the use of generative AI for imaginative functions should be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without permission ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's construct it fairly and fairly."
OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with OpenAI for example.
The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".
He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.
"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is weakening among its finest performing markets on the vague promise of growth."
A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national information library including public information from a broad range of sources will likewise be provided to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.
But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.
This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.
The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it must be spending for it.
If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.
When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.
But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, garagesale.es I'm unsure for how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
1
How an AI written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives
Alonzo Somerset edited this page 3 weeks ago